"Sure we are good enough:p. I have 6-7 years of ee2 experience, I am positive I have something to teach you:p. Btw, I am the CCCP guy."---> I meant this sentence like:" Yes we can teach you how to play cause I have more experience"Btw You said "We" in the first part, then you said "I". I want just to say that a person doesn't make a whole clan.Malistrom wrote:Matty, the patriarch and Jjoker are the same exact account.:/. And to be honest, I feel you are getting too cocky>.>. Yesterday I played more than 10 games against eWs, and that got me my 1350 rating account in 16 games...a few of those were 1vs1s against you. Also, when did you get the idea that I was telling you how to play? I never do. Yes, you are good at building and army, but you need army control.
Yes, i saw that account. But remember that smurfing helps to win games, because you know how the enemy plays, but the other player doesn't know your style of game. For example, i wouldn't make so many defs for each cc if you weren't mali or colby. Moreover, you won all games against me rated, but remember that you lost some games too in unrated. Yes, it wasn't a real 1v1, cause we were near a during a 2v2/3v3, but it doesn't influence very much the destiny of the game.
Yes, i totally agree with you in last sentence.. I have never been good to manage army even if i got better than before, when i was worse than me now. You manage army much better than me and i admit it and moreover i don't play all games in the same way and i lose a lot of matches for experience. Even if i should have a lot of experience, i still lose 60% of games which I lost cause it, while you are more constant, very rarely i see you failing and you know always what's better to do.
I am not getting cocky, I see statistics, because maths helps to be as objective as possible.