Page 2 of 2
Re: Who like Ram edit?
Posted: 07 Jan 2012, 00:59
by Deus
Still wouldn't happen irl..
Re: Who like Ram edit?
Posted: 07 Jan 2012, 05:31
by Legolego40
I think that rams do a good amount of damage. They're for destroying buildings, and they do it very well. If they were to do half the damage, their lack of defensive capabilities would make them too vulnerable, since they would be stuck at one building for too long.
I vote no.
Re: Who like Ram edit?
Posted: 07 Jan 2012, 05:35
by Dr.MonaLisa
Yeah, I voted "NO" now too.. For example if someone outpost rush you, you need rams as weapon :/
Re: Who like Ram edit?
Posted: 07 Jan 2012, 09:29
by RGV1
"I like, its is better to game.
I don't like, this disrupts the EE2 "
I vote for
I like, its is better to game.
The decrease in attacks 2 times - not much will change gameplay.
Ram will remain the most effective unit against buildings.
I think these questions about the tactics of the game very much.
You are too accustomed to the original tactics and do not want to change the gameplay. Game developers improved it in Patch 1.2. You do not want to change the gameplay. I understand you think the tactics ee2 ideal?
You are very conservative.
Ram
3 era hp 500, dg 300
5 era hp 800, dg 300
Ram in the original game, very strong unit. The Army of 5-6 Ram could destroy any fortifications.
In the life of Ram used only against the wooden walls and gates. Against the stone walls of Ram was useless.