This is not going to end positively for TheKnight.
This part itself:
TheKnight wrote: ↑10 Nov 2021, 01:19I was just defending myself against you and Gnoo and saying my opinion to the situation. You didn't protect kosta and Daniel... Don't lie...
Shows that he ignores all arguments, proof and accuses people of "lying", while one page back everything is shown even in text marked in colors:
viewtopic.php?p=26900#p26900
Prof.N|o_o|B : wood
Prof.N|o_o|B : dont build cc
Prof.N|o_o|B : kosta
Prof.N|o_o|B : or build and send!!!!!!!!!!!!
HalloweenPlayers : take his territory
HalloweenPlayers : take terr
*uRs*destajador(`;-;`) : no kosstaa
kosta : ok
HalloweenPlayers : ahahhaa
*uRs*destajador(`;-;`) : noo ttake
HalloweenPlayers : gainterritory
HalloweenPlayers : gainterritory
*uRs*destajador(`;-;`) : no kossta
*uRs*destajador(`;-;`) : give terr dr
Slayer_00010 : kosta the noob
Prof.N|o_o|B : thx
HalloweenPlayers : stop bullying him
HalloweenPlayers : he actually donated 300 wood and stone
HalloweenPlayers : Unlikely some of you who didn't send a cent to EE2.eu
HalloweenPlayers : witch8
<<*TOP*>>TheKnight : desa like always gave us guy who doesn't understand in english
HalloweenPlayers : Daniel knows English better than you
It clearly shows my support for the "bullied" players (on both sides). No matter how clear the evidence is, he will endlessly attempt to change words. He will endlessly take 1 message out of context of 10 previous ones, and he will create 10 other false accusations based on it. This is an intentional words twisting, caused either by desperation and lack of real arguments, or simply illness that I questioned in my previous messages.
The community poll already gives a devastating result for TheKnight. Although according to the Rules of the polls:
viewtopic.php?f=58&t=1700
d) Other rules:
- Every poll has the "Vote cancelling allowed" option checked, so everybody may cancel their choice and vote again (of course if the poll hasn't been already closed).
- If any Minister who works in the
Ministry of Game Affairs decide to create a poll to a topic - the poll score has no effect for the final decision of the selected Department. Of course the Minister may suggest with the poll score, but his decision may be different.
The Minister still has a deciding voice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, let's remind that according to previous decisions, TheKnight was supposed to remain muted. He has been conditionally unmuted by me, as an attempt to solve the conflicts. Now we all know that it was a bad decision that made him think that he is still allowed to continue the toxicness.
Second of all, to close this case I propose the following solution:
- Conditional punishment for TheKnight which gives me permission to limit UP1.5 features for his account. This would be:
* Disallowing to use the audio taunts system.
* Disallowing to use observers-to-players chatting feature.
* Disallowing to use MonaNAT servers which are funded by players donations, and he seem to have a huge problem with them.
He would not get banned or muted, just lose access to features he continuously criticizes.
This is the best idea I could came up with. The punishment that would give me a satisfaction for being "insulted" about developing useless updates, and would not limit his rights to play with "friends" (if any remaining he has).
Please let me know if this proposition is acceptable for the Department of Justice. I am not asking TheKnight, because his feedback will include words twisting, an attempt to insult me in a no-direct way, resulting in my growing angriness and pushing for the ban instead of this HEAIVLY reduced proposition.