Moved from: t1534 - Difference between EE2: MoJ and MoJ in real life
Posted: 24 Aug 2012, 00:21
Hm, I am sorry for my intromission in this thread. But I would like to state my understanding related to this present "ministery of justice".
I was checking some reponsibilities and weights that only the minister of justice is able to manage and effectuate, which are the following items:
Nevertheless, my purpose here is simply to suggest another form of judging these cases, even though it isn't necessary to rearrange this system of proceeding right now-immediately. I just propose that we should have three people able to judge and decide the cases in their own views. If we, for exemple, let someone like matty remains, other person might think we're letting him on it because he's in the ew clan and might benefit our clan; and it's consequently "unfair"(likewise timo). Therefore, in order to provide one better unbiased regime, there must have three judges; however, they mustn't be of the same clan and or same group in case they have it.
My list goes for: timo in the name of eeg clan(being 1rd one); matty in the name of ew clan(being 2rd one); and for last, someone like banzai or silver... well, i don't know, but theorically, it must be someone without any clan(because besides ew and eeg, there's none) and interested to judge and help our actual existent community.
That's my understanding about what would be "fair" in the resolution of the cases. Sure thing that, I won't obligate its implementation, I just announced it for now. If, tomorrow, you guys see any problem related to the judgements of the cases, you can execute this proposal as one states form of solution.
-Any suggestion, comment, review and or opinion is admissible-
Thanks in antecipation.
I was checking some reponsibilities and weights that only the minister of justice is able to manage and effectuate, which are the following items:
Actually, in real life, minister of justice isn't instructed to administrate/decide any judgement and or punishment of people, solving their respective problems... He has other responsibilities instead. Who is responsible to judge and decide about this kind of situation is the "judge"(or jury in other nations), varying according to the own power vested by his merits or nomeation.Leader wrote:Ministry of Justice
Responsibilities:
- administration of justice
- solving problems without using force between players
- ensuring the regularity of all new Amending Acts
- punishment players which insulted / hacked / did something wrong against versus players.
Nevertheless, my purpose here is simply to suggest another form of judging these cases, even though it isn't necessary to rearrange this system of proceeding right now-immediately. I just propose that we should have three people able to judge and decide the cases in their own views. If we, for exemple, let someone like matty remains, other person might think we're letting him on it because he's in the ew clan and might benefit our clan; and it's consequently "unfair"(likewise timo). Therefore, in order to provide one better unbiased regime, there must have three judges; however, they mustn't be of the same clan and or same group in case they have it.
My list goes for: timo in the name of eeg clan(being 1rd one); matty in the name of ew clan(being 2rd one); and for last, someone like banzai or silver... well, i don't know, but theorically, it must be someone without any clan(because besides ew and eeg, there's none) and interested to judge and help our actual existent community.
That's my understanding about what would be "fair" in the resolution of the cases. Sure thing that, I won't obligate its implementation, I just announced it for now. If, tomorrow, you guys see any problem related to the judgements of the cases, you can execute this proposal as one states form of solution.
-Any suggestion, comment, review and or opinion is admissible-
Thanks in antecipation.